Blogroll

Blogger news

Showing posts with label features. Show all posts
Showing posts with label features. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

Facebook’s “Promote Your Post” Feature – Boom or Bust..?



Facebook’s “Promote Your Post” Feature – Boom or Bust?




On the heels of Facebook’s IPO bust, they launched a feature that now allows you topromote your Facebook posts so that more of your fans will see it.  (Your page must have at least 400 Likes.)
All promoted posts will show up as a “Sponsored Listing” in your fan’s feeds.
Statistics have already proven that Facebook users generally ignore ads, and GM recently pulled their campaign due to poor performance.
Granted, this is a little different than a regular ad because the post will be showed to people who already “Like” your page, but anytime the word “Sponsored” is used, it has a promotional feel to it.
So I don’t know about you, but this announcement didn’t make me do any happy dances. ;)

Why Use It?

If you have a Facebook page, you’ve probably already noticed a limited percentage of your fans actually see your posts.  In fact, Facebook admitted that brand page content is only viewed by 16% of your fans on average.
This is due to many reasons – users not logged in when you post, they get lost in the shuffle of other posts and pages people “Like”, etc.
And of course, the skeptic in me can’t help but wonder if they are now ensuring your posts are shown to a limited number of people to encourage more ad spend.
Let’s face it.  At the end of the day, it’s about making money – anything to help their ailing stock, right?
According to FB, not only will this feature ensure more post visibility by giving it a sponsored label, but when your fans interact with the promoted post, it will be shown to their friends as well.

Is it Worth It?

Post promotion has its place, but I wouldn’t just haphazardly use it without a solid plan.
Say you’re having a huge promotion or contest for UK residents only.   Since you can target the post, you may consider testing it out for something like this because you can reach more relevant people.
You also have to consider the fundamentals of marketing.  More views is not necessarily better if you struggle with fan interaction and engagement to begin with.  Just like pay-per-click marketing or any kind of paid advertising, your content needs to convert for the campaign to be successful.
So if your paid Facebook post gives you 50% more views, but your engagement (likes, comments or whatever you’re measuring) shows minimal results, technically that campaign was a failure.
So I wouldn’t throw any dollars into any advertising until you have a real plan in mind and understand that the basic rules of marketing and engagement still apply.
So tell me.  Would you ever pay to promote your posts on Facebook?  Have you tried it yet?  What are your thoughts about this in general?  I’d love to hear from those who’ve tried it.
you may also like
samsung galaxy s3 vs iphone 5
for more stay tuned on http://polytechmate.blogspot.in/


HYPER-V VS. VMWARE COMPARISON


                             HYPER-V VS. VMWARE COMPARISON
Choosing the right Virtualization software for your datacenter is a complex task. Microsoft's Hyper-V has become a formidable competitor to VMware, especially with Windows Server 2008 R2.  So we thought we would share our experience via this comparison of VMware versus Hyper-V, the leading server virtualization solutions.

Hyper-V versus VMware - Pricing
If you already have a Windows Server 2008 OS platform, you can download Hyper-V Server at no cost. The only cost is for the System Center management framework. Microsoft includes management of physical and virtual environments along with Hyper-V and VMware.

Hyper-V provides you with migration capabilities: Live Migration is included in Windows Server 2008 R2 at no extra charge.  We are using it and can attest to R2's robustness.  With VMware, VMotion in both Foundation and Standard editions, there is an additional charge if you want to add migration capabilities.

Take a look at the following table, you will see side-by-side the cost comparison of Hyper-V vs VMware. All of VMware feature comparisons use Virtual Infrastructure Enterprise and most of its pricing comparisons use Virtual Infrastructure Foundation. Costs are for five physical servers.  We've made the assumption that you've already paid for the host server OS in this comparison.

http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/green_top_lef_roundedcornr.png
Microsoft Hyper-V Server with
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/green_top_right_roundedcornr.png
Existing OS
5 Servers

 Microsoft Hyper-V Server
$0

 System Center Management Suite
7,520
 Enterprise + 2-year SA

 System Center Ops Mgr Server
581

 System Center Configuration Manager
580

 System Center Data Protection
581
 Manager Server
*      Total
$9,262
VMware ESXi with
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/darkgray_top_right_roundedcornr.png
Existing OS
5 Servers

 Existing operating system
$0

 vCenter + 2-year SA
7,318

 2 processer infrastructure Enterprise License + 2-year SA
42,125










Total
$49,443

Hyper-V R2 versus VMware - Feature Comparison
The following chart compares VMware Enterprise core features with Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V (r2) and System Center Management core features.

http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/lefttop_roundedcornr.png
VMware VI
Microsoft WS08
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/righttop_roundedcornr.png
Feature
Enterprise
Hyper-V R2/SMSE
 Bare-metal hypervisor
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg ESX/ESXi
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg Hyper-V

 Centralized hypervisor management
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg Virtual Center
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE (VMM)

 VMware and Microsoft management
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/xmark.jpg None
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE (VMM)

 VM backup
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg VCB (proxy only)
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE (DPM)

 VM High availability/failover
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg Virtual Center
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg WS08 Clustering

 VM migration
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg VMotion
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg Live Migration

 Storage VMotion
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg Yes
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/xmark.jpg Not yet

 Guest OS patching/management
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg Yes
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE (SCCM)

 End-to-end OS monitoring
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/xmark.jpg None
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE (Ops Mgr)

 Host/VM level optimization
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg DRS
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE (PRO)

 Application/service monitoring
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/xmark.jpg None
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE (PRO)

 Integrated physical and virtual management
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/xmark.jpg None
http://www.milesconsultingcorp.com/images/checkmark.jpg SMSE

                VMI: VMware Infrastructure              WS08: Windows Server 2008 R2
                VCB: VMware Consolidated Backup   SMSE: System Center Server Management Suite
                VMM: Virtual Machine Manager          DPM: Data Protection Manager

Notes:
With Microsoft, virtualization with Hyper-V was built into Windows Server 2008. For heavy Microsoft shops, this means tighter integration with your existing infrastructure and management tools. Since Hyper-V is part of Windows Server 2008, your IT staff will use it seamlessly because they are familiar with the Windows look-and-feel.

Fewer virtual machines, in some situations, can be run on Hyper-V than you can on ESX Server, but Hyper-V is based on Windows Server 2008 and because of that you can run these machines on pretty well any hardware configuration, any hardware configuration that is designed to support Windows. You can only run VMware on maybe dozens or fewer number of server configurations than you can run Windows. That means that Hyper-V can be run on hundreds and hundreds, if not thousands, of configurations whereas because ESX Server, VMware is a more limited product because of that.

One thing that Microsoft has done very well is that they have tried to add as many management tools for virtualization as possible and of course, the market leader in terms of virtualization management tools is VMware. Microsoft has almost as many tools as VMware in terms of virtualization management.

Microsoft, by the way, just upgraded the number of cores that you can run with Hyper-V by releasing support for Intel’s new 6-core processors, so that means you can now run up to 24 cores.

Microsoft supports a limited number of Linux distributions (today SUSE), so keep that in mind. If you have a wider number of platforms to support, VMware ESX is your choice.

Hyper-V lets you manage virtual and physical environments and uses common deployment, provisioning, monitoring, and backup methodologies across both. VMware’s answer to management is to use Virtual Infrastructure Enterprise and Virtual Center, but even these tools won't allow to manage multiple hypervisors, physical resources or applications. You may also want see how Hyper-V compares to Xen.

Virtualization Consultants from Miles Consulting Corp
Regardless of your choice between VMware and Microsoft Hyper-V, our team of Server Virtualization Consultants will help your organization to select the right virtualization technology. They also will help you plan, install, configure and optimize your chosen virtualization platform. Feel free to call us for a free demonstration.